Interpretation of legal norms often involves subjectivity, even as courts strive for objectivity. Our approach transforms legal norms into precise mathematical models, limiting personal bias and variability. By encoding quantifiable metrics, we deliver transparent, reproducible standards of legal review that withstand rigorous scrutiny and promote consistent outcomes.
This project establishes a rigorous, mathematically grounded standard of review to assess whether cantonal assistance regimes satisfy the constitutionally guaranteed minimum subsistence threshold.